Finally, a real debate with political substance! The 8-podium game show system has obviously played out its role in the GOP’s primary process and we are now at the stage where they are feeling out who will be the clear nominee and who is up for veep and cabinet positions. Fortunately this means we the public finally get more than a magazine-gloss look at the candidates. There was a lot of beltway snickers as to the gimmick of a Lincoln-Douglass style debate but the Webster Institute was absolutely delighted at the prospect. We are also glad to report that it went as planned, with calm and reasoned discourse and detailed policy discussion.
This was certainly Gingrich’s brightest moment so far in terms of coming across as appealing to independents; as it was a debate focused on foreign policy there was little room for Newt to joyfully promote Dickensian labor laws.
Huntsman was very much in standard form: crisp, technical and extremely Whiggish; occasionally dropping left-field Bush Snr. style metaphors which make sense apparently only to himself. As for Gingrich, his cultish devotion to management theory led him to recommend the entire US government go Six-Sigma. One of Huntsman’s daughters in the audience off nodded during the discussion of the Arab Spring.
All in all, it didn’t come across as a gimmick or boring to us, it has greatly informed our understanding of both Huntsman’s and Gingrich’s basic ideological stances and the flavors of policy nuance they prefer without having to view it through the glib and tinseled lens of the major debates.
We welcome more of these small forum, long-form debates as they clearly tell a person much more about the candidates and how they would act as president than any of the previous 14 large forum debates combined.